Linguistics | What is semantics?
English linguistic
Semantics
Semantics is the section of linguistics science that deals with the studies of meaning, changes in meanings, and the principles that rule the relationship between words, sentences and their meaning. It is the studies of the relationships between symbols, signs and anything they represent.
What is semantics?
Semantics is the studies of meanings in languages. It is a large subject within the general studies of languages. to understanding semantics is fundamental about the studying languages congest, how languages users obtain a sense of meanings, such as writers, speakers, listeners and readers. It is as well fundamental to the study of language change, how meanings modify over time.
It is science for understanding language in social context, as these are likely to affect meanings, and about understanding varieties of English languages and effect of styles. It is thus one of the most essential concepts in linguistics. The studies of semantics including the study of how meaning is obscured, contradicted, constructed, clarified, interpreted and paraphrased. Some important areas of semantics theories or related subjects includes these:
- Symbol and referent
- Conceptions of meaning Words and lexemes
- Denotation, connotation, implication
- Pragmatics
- Ambiguity
- Metaphor, simile and symbol
- Semantic fields
- Synonym, antonym and hyponym
- Collocation, fixed expression and idiom
- Semantic change and etymology
- Polysemy
- Homonymy, homophones and homographs
- Lexicology and lexicography
- Thesauruses, libraries and Web portals
- Epistemology
- Color
The Adjective and Noun semantics are derived from (“significant”), the Greek word "semantikos". In linguistics, semantics is the subfield that is devoted to the study of meanings, as borne on the syntactics levels of words, sentences, phrases, and sometimes larger units of discourse, in general, "referredtoas" texts.
Along thousands of years, philosophers have speculated the meaning of meanings, so far, the speakers of a language could understand what is said to them and can manufacture strings of words which are significative to the other speakers. To understanding languages, we need to know the meanings of words and the morphemes that compose them.
We also must know how the meanings of words join into sentence meanings and phrases.in the end, we have to consider context when determining meanings. The studies of the More linguistic lesson meaning of phrases, morphemes, words and sentences is called Semantics.
Subfields of semantics are lexical " of or morphemes relating to the words, vocabulary, or of a language" semantics, that is concern with the meaning relationships among words, the meaning of words, and sentential or phrasal semantics, which concern with the meaning of syntactic units larger than the word.
The studies of how context affects meaning which called Pragmatics. Example, the sentence "It's cold in here" could be interpreted in certain situations, "close the windows".
Grammatical according to the lexical classification, it is non-sense on a semantic level. Or so goes the claim. But a question here, is the claim correct!? According to a well-established usage of the word (Green), a green idea is one which is new and untried. Once again, a colorless idea is one without unexciting and vividness, dull. So, it following that a colorless green idea is a new, untried idea that is without unexciting and vividness, dull.
To sleep is through other things, to be in a state of unconsciousness, or in a state of inactivity. To sleep furiously maybe seem a vague turn of phrase but one reflecting which the mind in sleep often indeed moving furiously with ideas and images flickering in and out. So that, what is the poet telling us? (Let s assume that the quoted streak is from the work of a poet, working in an average of studied ambiguity and accuracy. Or partly, like we shall see...) Very merely the poet looks to be said that new ideas, not yet circulate in the unconscious, sharply defined, or rapidly altering at a furious rate.
One question is left then. Why is this nice bit of poetic imagery quote by its author as a quintessentially unmeaning sentence? Here we have a prefect bit of mockery. The author clearly has a turn for poetry, a turn which he turns his face against. And the hidden face, has taken its revenge, the denied self. The scientist has called on his creative self to show a bit of humbug.
The poet denied has replied with a sentence, apparently unmeaning, that is no such thing when listened to with a careful ear. And so far, consider; this sentence is a very intellectualized production: it is indeed "colorless". It was, we scent, a new idea, a variant of a possibility, still new at the very moment of production, one occurring by chance in the froth of the unconscious. In brief, the quote sentence was a colorless green idea that had slept furiously.
No comments